Recently, there has been an increase in new fans. As usual, it’s necessary to explain the purpose of this account. This account has always been unconventional, starting with sports commentary, focusing on current affairs, while also reminiscing and chatting. The writing style is ‘speaking nonsense in a serious manner’. Although some words may be harsh, they absolutely convey ‘positive energy’.
In the end, whether it’s me or my fans, we are all ordinary onlookers. For example, these past few days, the rich people have gone to Paris to watch the Olympics, while we, the poor onlookers, are just eating a melon and enjoying the shade under the trees, watching the excitement.
The Olympics are actually the same as eating a melon, just for the enjoyment and pleasure. For example, after the ‘Sha Tou’ combination won the first mixed doubles gold medal in the history of Chinese table tennis, joy turned to sorrow. Da Tou’s favorite racket was stepped on by a reporter. So what if it was stepped on? He can still play with a spare racket. But then Da Tou lost to a Swedish player in the men’s singles match, failing to reach the top sixteen. Some people insisted on linking these two things together, which is meaningless.
You, Da Tou, the world number one, can’t play if you change a racket, and you’re sure to win against a player ranked outside the top 20? What kind of nonsense is this? Da Tou himself admitted that it had nothing to do with changing the racket, and you’re still nagging like an old woman, aren’t you?
At this time, the Japanese player Mizutani Jun jumped out to stir up trouble, saying that between two equally skilled athletes, the one who changes the racket will lose ‘10000%’. Why don’t you say a small goal of one percent?
Sports competitions have wins and losses, which is actually very normal. For example, the world runner-up, the Chinese women’s basketball team, suffered two consecutive losses. Isn’t this normal? Can’t the world runner-up lose? Who made that rule? For example, our men’s gymnastics team lost to the Japanese team and finished second. Gymnastics celebrity Li Xiaoshuang excitedly jumped out and said it was a ‘coach problem’.
Damn it, Xiaoshuang is talking without any pain. If he doesn’t coach, it’s definitely a huge loss for the gymnastics world.
This morning, Pan Zhanle in the swimming pool not only made the European and American stars drink his bathwater, but also left the world record behind. This is the first time a Chinese athlete has stood on the highest podium in the men’s 100-meter freestyle, and the gold content is close to Liu Xiang’s. Watching the foreigners being defeated, my heart is filled with joy.
When you win, be happy and enjoy it to the fullest; when you lose, don’t be discouraged, and don’t be filled with resentment.
You should have a normal mentality when watching a competition, and isn’t it the same when eating a melon? Civilized eating of melons, rational eating of melons, this is the highest realm of eating melons, and it is the ‘8-character principle’ that melon eaters must follow.
For example, the Jiangxi ‘Peiqi incident’ has overshadowed the heat of the Paris Olympics these past few days. The melon eaters are enjoying it, but because of various unconfirmed news flying around, the melon eaters are easily confused and fall into the ‘surrounding circle’ of bad information.
The reason why the ‘Peiqi incident’ remains hot and has constant highlights is because the derivative rumors are particularly explosive and eye-catching. For example, the online rumor of ‘Li Moumou, who was sexually assaulted, died mysteriously and was found without vital signs’ forced the local network information office to come forward to refute the rumors.
At this time, melon eaters should not blindly follow the trend, should not be biased and believe, and must have their own judgment. Do not spread rumors, do not believe rumors, and do not create rumors, which is the bottom line for melon eaters at any time.
I didn’t believe the rumor that ‘Li Moumou is dead’ from the beginning. The reason is simple: this is just an ordinary case. How many secrets can a township party secretary master, and how much of a storm can they stir up? So no one is stupid enough to kill someone to cover their tracks.
Also, some people have listed more than 10 female officials above the level of a ten-thousand-year-old section chief, all of whom are beautiful cadres at the level of Secretary Li, and even younger, and even compared the ten-thousand-year-old to a ‘beauty nest’. Such questioning of the local officialdom’s ecology is extremely unserious and irresponsible.
Reasonable reasoning is acceptable, but if you describe it in this way, by name and by implication, using the method of ‘non-existent’, it seems unfair to these beautiful cadres. It’s already difficult for women in the workplace, and it’s absolutely unacceptable to use colored glasses to stigmatize them, and to condemn a whole group of people.
The Olympics are in full swing, and the ‘Peiqi case’ is full of doubts.
Secretary Li said, ‘I’m afraid you can’t help it.’
Secretary Mao heard it, he said, ‘No, I won’t, I won’t.’
Secretary Mao held back, and you still can’t hold back?
Civilized eating of melons, rational eating of melons.
Melon eaters, waiting for the results.
Discover more from 自由档案馆
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.