Mu Bai’s writing is mediocre | Well, the huge property of the leaders’ parents belongs to privacy!

By Mu Bai

Articles about that war can no longer be written, no matter how gentle they are!

I’m not being nitpicky, it’s just that a person who makes a living by writing naturally needs to choose topics that can be written. Novels are what I want to write most, but in this fast-paced era, not many people are willing to settle down and read a plain, unexciting realistic novel.

I’m still thinking today, what else can be written online now, it seems there isn’t.

I don’t know if I can write the following?

The general idea is that a woman was ordered to publicly apologize after revealing the huge assets of the parents of a leader of the Chongqing Civil Affairs Bureau, and the official reason was that the issues reported by the woman were not work-related, and the leader’s parents’ issues involved personal privacy!

Here are a few points:

First, the official rhetoric is very interesting: the leader is the leader, and the leader’s parents’ affairs are personal privacy. Let’s make an analogy: a town mayor is known for his integrity, and he is a very good mayor, but the problem is that this mayor has two idle sons who drive luxury cars outside every day, have dozens of properties under their names, and spend lavishly. Then the question arises, should the discipline inspection commission investigate this phenomenon?

Will investigating the mayor’s sons also be met with the statement that the mayor is the mayor, and the mayor’s sons’ affairs are the privacy of their sons?

The leader of the Chongqing Civil Affairs Bureau is also the same. Ordinary retired workers have acquired 10 properties and a Bentley luxury car in just three years. The source of this property will naturally attract people’s attention. Then, when citizens see it and expose it, in the final analysis, it is also contributing to anti-corruption and promoting integrity. Regardless of whether the leader ultimately engaged in corruption or used their parents’ identities to make money, this is all about pointing out the problems that have been seen, and it is doing good!

This behavior not only does not need an apology, but also needs to be rewarded.

Now being ordered to apologize, does this mean that citizens have been deprived of the right to supervision granted by the constitution?

Second, there have been many corrupt officials exposed in recent years. The most famous recently were the ‘several young masters’ of the Hunan high-ranking officials. During that time, the internet was almost entirely filled with gossip about the luxurious lives of these young masters, especially the netizens in Hunan. Those who knew the inside stories vividly depicted the luxurious lives of the young masters. In their descriptions, to use a line from Peking opera, the young masters were like immortals from heaven!

But the problem is, everyone knows about the luxurious lives of the young masters, and ordinary people have already seen it clearly. Why is it that only after their parents were arrested can people discuss it on the internet, and only then can they swarm over like flies seeing shit?

First of all, when discussing the ‘several young masters’ on the internet, I had no idea that there were such ‘immortals’ in the Changsha circle. After the incident, I did not participate in writing a single word when the flies were swarming, because I felt that since we couldn’t say anything when they were living a carefree life, then it would be a bit too cheap to follow suit and say something after they fell. You can do whatever you want.

It is also because of this phenomenon of no one speaking out that those who dared to expose the wealth of their family members when the leaders still held power are worthy of praise.

There is also such a scene in a certain TV series: ‘Big brother, you go ahead, I don’t have much ability, but I can still support you.’

At this moment, the Chongqing woman who was ordered to apologize is the big brother in the TV series, and I am writing this article to support her.

Third, has everyone noticed a phenomenon: writers who have been criticized and thrown into the trash heap in international conflicts have gradually fallen silent, and they are unwilling to write even when ordinary people around them encounter unfortunate events.

Many people say, ‘Author, editor, why don’t you write about this topic? Why don’t you write about this topic that has no risk? Write about it, you should write about this kind of thing!’

Then the question arises!

My article yesterday posted a screenshot of someone reporting me, and she sent me the screenshot of her report.

In fact, there are such reports, especially recently, with no less than 300 people reporting me every day. I shouldn’t care, but the problem is, it’s still that sentence, do you know what kind of person you are reporting?

You are reporting a person who, from the day, the moment, the second that their sense of right and wrong was formed, has never harbored a harmful intention, and has always treated society and those around them with kindness.

The kind of articles and authors that you are happy about in international events, when the people around you or even yourself encounter something bad, should turn to them for help, not to us.

In this world, many people, as they walk along, their hearts become cold.

Like at this moment, look at the drifting drizzle outside, this is not rain, this is the human world’s scheming, the dirty and miscellaneous fragments!

谢谢！