What is the intention of the person who made this decision?
Recently, Geng’s video exposing the ‘National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars’ and scholars at the dean level caused a huge uproar. If he had exposed only one person, the impact might not have been so great.
But he was too aggressive, reporting five people at once, and even naming certain schools, asking them to investigate themselves.
This has a huge impact.
But if what he said is true, exposing academic fraud, isn’t that a great thing for the progress of our country’s science and technology?
However, the development of the matter took a thought-provoking turn.
Later, Geng gave a speech at his alma mater, after which he said he would suspend the exposure, and meaningfully said, ‘The law does not punish the masses.’
What a ‘law does not punish the masses’, it feels like there is a lot of information contained within.
And today, I saw that Geng’s Douyin account was permanently restricted. And the Xingtu commercial orders were also permanently banned.
What is the reason for this? What exactly did he do wrong that he should be punished? After all, any punishment should be based on openness and transparency. An account is also a person’s digital asset, there should be a reason, it can’t be fabricated.
Douyin’s purpose in doing this is too obvious. Restricting Geng’s account is to prevent him from speaking. If he speaks without traffic, he will have no influence. Banning his account’s commercial orders is to cut off his financial path and make him unprofitable.
But, there should be a reason, what went wrong.
He was just reporting misconduct in the academic circle. No matter what, it is a great thing for the country and the people.
I suspect that there are traitors in Douyin, restricting Geng’s account, silencing him, and reducing his influence. This is to affect the development of our country’s science and technology.
Think about it, if these papers are all faked by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars, what scientific research results can they produce? Isn’t this purely a waste of research funds? It delays our progress in catching up with and surpassing the UK and the US.
What is the intention of the person who made this decision?
And this also indirectly shows that the degree of academic fraud now may be beyond imagination.
If a large number of problems are found in the papers of those ‘National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars’ and academicians, then the current academic circles will experience a major earthquake.
This has a greater impact, so it is inevitable that Geng will shut up.
It’s just that I didn’t expect Douyin’s actions to be so fast, even adding drama to itself, privately restricting Geng’s traffic and banning commercial orders, as if it was giving a name card to those who are faking.
Even if Geng shuts up, once this opening is made, it will be difficult to close.
What is scary is not Geng’s two million fans, but his set of methods for targeting academic fraud.
Papers, data, experimental results, these are originally public information. As long as the method is appropriate, anyone can question and verify based on public materials. Once this kind of supervision ability is formed, it will not disappear because of the silence of one person.
What is truly influential is never one person, but a way of thinking.
Using this method, if Geng falls, there will be students Zhao, Qian, Sun, and Li.
Even if Geng no longer speaks out, people will not forget this earthquake in the academic world. It actually ended in this way.
In the future, those people who want to fake again will also have to think twice.
The end of the full text
Please pay attention, like, and comment
Discover more from 自由档案馆
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
