Hui Chang You Dao | Caixin’s manufacturing data has become a swan song, and nine major data will no longer be released from now on

I’ve always felt that if we want society to become more transparent and credible, then the disclosure of information in all aspects is very necessary, especially the disclosure of public data, which is of paramount importance.

However, in recent years, there has been a trend of more and more data no longer being disclosed, becoming increasingly secretive. With Caixin Magazine no longer publishing manufacturing data today, this secrecy is becoming more widespread.

This is the manufacturing data published by Caixin last month.

Next is the data for June, a picture of optimism.

However, this morning, Caixin Magazine released such an announcement.

Some netizens believe that this is because Caixin Magazine is running out of money, so they made such a decision.

This brings about such an impact.

In this way, we can’t see at least nine aspects of data. In addition to Caixin’s manufacturing data, we can’t see these eight data.

I don’t know the reason why these data are no longer published. All I know is that when more and more data is becoming a black hole, the relevant research institutions will find it even more difficult to make reasonable predictions, and ordinary people will find it even more difficult to make judgments based on the data.

I can only think that it is probably because these data are closely related to economic activities, and with the current economic situation at hand, what these data are like, and what kind of impact their publication will bring, are obviously clear to see.

In order to maintain public confidence, more and more negative data are no longer published. This is the reason I can think of. The most representative is these nine data. In addition, there are data on cremation, BCG vaccination, and so on.

But will this really not damage credibility, and will it not increase the doubts of netizens?

I think these questions need to be taken seriously, unless they really don’t care about the public’s thoughts, then it’s another matter.

PS: In addition, I solemnly apologize to my friends for last night’s article. Because I did not fulfill my review responsibility, I rashly published AI articles created by other netizens, which misled everyone. This is my fault. I sincerely apologize to everyone here. I will be more rigorous in the future to ensure that I will not disappoint you.